Friday, March 30, 2012

The other Wes Moore, One Name, Two Fates











How are both Wes Moore's alike? Give some background information that discusses the similarities between the two men and their respective histories.

The two Wes Moore’s are similar not only because they grew up in the same neighborhood, but because the boys had similar stories as they were growing up as kids. Both kids’ did not have an ideal family situation at home, both with strong mother figures and both having to deal with growing up without a solid male role model. Their communities both had impacts on their lives, with the people inside the community influencing their decisions they made in life. While the author’s mother chose to move out of Baltimore to avoid the chaos during that time, she felt moving to New York would help provide more opportunities for her young son. The other Wes was caught up within the violent riots and protest that were occurring in Baltimore.

You also see the impact of their siblings, and how their influence helped shaping the men the two boys become. The most important influence on the author’s live seems to be his sister Nikki, while Tony is Wes’ influence. Nikki was a positive older role model to have for the author while the other Wes looked up to his drug dealing brother. Both had run into trouble while they were younger, both given second chances, and this is where they begin to differ. Neither of the boys enjoyed going to school, and would rather focus on the things the enjoyed or how to make money. With two boys with the same name, living during the same time in similar situations, it’s hard to understand how different the two become as they get older.

Discuss a turning point in both boys' lives, where they seemingly learned from a mistake and took some action to try and correct it. What decision or action did they take to "straighten up" their lives?

As the boys become older they begin to drift down different paths on their way to becoming adults. One key event that both boys had dealt with was their respective run-ins with the police. The author got caught hanging around with someone who really doesn’t care about him, who pushed drugs and started trouble. When the two get caught spray painting, the cops let him off. This is where the author is faced with a situation in his life, and he chooses to learn from it, not repeat it. This is where family values come into play; because the author’s biggest fear about being arrested had been to fear his mother. This shows the type of person the author is, not wanting to disappoint the woman that has loved and cared for him. From that moment on, wanting to avoid confrontations with the police, the author goes on to go to military school to become successful in that. Even though he struggled and wanted to quit many times, after realizing how much his mother really does for him. This is when I believe he really “straightens up”.

The other Wes Moore had many encounters with the police as he was growing up. When he was younger growing up in Baltimore, he had a confrontation with a kid who had punched him after getting into an argument over a football game. Furious about being disrespected in front of his friends, he goes home to return with a knife to try to get revenge on the boy who embarrassed him. Cops had arrived after hearing complaints from the neighbors about a scuffle. The cops intercepted Wes, knife in hand, on his way to hurt the boy. Unlike the author, Wes did not learn from being arrested. Many of the people he looked up to, the dealers and gangsters, had reputations for getting arrested multiple times. Avoiding his older brother’s advice, Wes became involved in the drug game. He flaunted his wealth, living the street life, with all the money, homies, and ladies, all proof of his work. Even after getting involved with shootings Wes wouldn’t learn. I believe the lack of family structure and values had been a major reason as to why Wes had such a troubled past. I don’t believe Wes truly straightened up until he had already been in jails for a crime he’d serve a life for.

What affect did these boys' parents have on their personal development? Discuss how each's mom and dad may have influenced them. Who was around? How did they help or hurt their son?

The author’s mother was his foundation into the person he later becomes. While he was growing up he had three people in his family he could look up to, his older sister, his mother and his father. He really loved his father and had fond memories of him when he was younger. Unfortunately, his father was killed from being poorly treated at a local hospital. Now the burden of raising a family rests on the shoulders of his mother. Although his mother seems strict, what she is trying to do is steer her son down the right path into manhood. Wes didn’t understand why his mother was so determined to get him through school. When his grades began to slip his mom’s only choice was to send him to military school. At first he couldn’t believe it. He felt betrayed by his mother, wondering how she could send he son to military school. Not until he becomes and adults and recollects on his past does he understand the sacrifices his mother made.

The other Wes Moore had a lot less structure to his family. You could almost feel why Wes was so at home with his friends out and about instead of at home. His home was broken, although his mother was a strong women like the author’s, she did not play a big enough part in his life to help him make decisions in life. His father was a junkie and played very little part in his life growing up. It is hard for an inner city kid to grow up without a father figure in his life. The person he looked up to was his older brother Tony, who was a major drug dealer around their Baltimore neighborhood. Wes wanted to be just like his brother, with the money, the respect, the nice gear. Tony always feared that Wes would want to join him in dealing drugs, so he told him at a very young age that he doesn’t want to get involved with what he was doing and wanted him to go to school. I feel like Tony is least at fault for Wes because he was the most concerned and tried his best just to keep Wes on the right track. I feel like his father, not only not being around, but because his reputation as a drug addict hurt him the most, not having someone to guide a boy through becoming a man.

What did this book teach you about human behavior? Think about life, change, and the idea of fate. Are there similar patterns between these two boys? Are these patterns found in all people? (Get philosophical.)

I believe that this book helps prove my belief that everyone determines their own destiny; it’s all based on what you really want and what you set your mind too. The story gives you a good view of human behavior, and how your outlook can change your fate. Two boys, in very similar conditions, manage to take two totally different paths in life. Such a drastic difference between the two, one a Rhodes Scholar, author, military vet and college graduate, while the other is labeled a murderer. As you talk to the other Wes you can tell deep down they aren’t too different, you can still sense the little boy growing up in Baltimore whom unfortunately didn’t realize his wrong doings until it was too late.

It amazes me that still til this day, young kids are so naive and often don’t realize the complications of their actions. Humans’ tend to be influenced rather easy, instead of going with their heads or hearts. The choice to do right or wrong is found in all people, but it’s how they choose to react that determines the type of person you are. Every person does not start off in the same situation, but your fate is determined by what you make of you opportunities in life. If you choose not to learn from your mistakes, as Wes did, your history is bound to repeat itself. I feel like your ability to bounce back and learn from your mistakes means a lot for the character you have.

Crititque: What did you like about the book? What didn't you like about the book. Give a brief book review that explains your reaction, and if you thought the book was influential.
I must say, I’m not much of a reader, but this movie was not only a quick read but fast paced and drew me in more and more. The imagery used by the author gave you a visual of what was occurring in the book. His description of the people with in the book not only gave you and image but an idea of who the person is and who he or she thinks. Similar to question 4, I really enjoyed the human element of the book, showing how your actions and errors pave a way to your future. It helps disprove that you are a product of your environment and helps highlight how you’re a product of your decisions. There were very few things I didn’t like about the book, but one thing I did not enjoy was having to determine who’s story I was reading about. With both of the boy’s being named Wes, during a break or new chapter it may require you to tract back and find out who you were reading about.

If I had to write a review of this book, I would give it a 4.5/5. This book was very entertaining, making every page wanting you to continue reading. Wes Moore does an excellent job writing this book, not only going in depth on his side of the story, but also gathering the other Wes Moore’s information. You can see the effort and time he put into this book, with countless hours spent visiting the Jessup Correctional Facility. If I had not read the introduction, my reaction would have been a lot stronger for the conclusion of the story.

I believe this book is very influential, to any young man growing up without a solid family structure, growing up within the city, you can often relate to the boys in the book. To anyone who thinks their lives are too hard or stressful to make anything of it, you should be thankful for what you have, and only have the things that put you down be a driving force towards change. There is someone in a very similar situation to you, and your goal should be to strive and be more successful.

Thursday, March 15, 2012

Election 2012....Going Once....Going twice...SOLD!!






Is the Citizens United decision good for US democracy, or will it limit/manipulate election? This is a tough question. Limiting the first amendment would be a crime against the first right we have as americans. But is the manipulation of the people who are not aware of the election fair from major companies brainwashing them with political BS? Does this mean the seat for the president can be bought? The most important factor is the Citizens United court case, the cases involved in the decsison, and the people effected by the decsison. Before you decide on what you believe is the right or wrong choice, you should look at both sides of the field.













The people who favor support the Citizens United Decision believe these people and corporations have a right to their opinions and should be allowed to voice them how they choose too. If you had money that you earned, the government in no way should be allowed to tell you how to spend your money, same way with the freedom of speech. There is no doubt that putting campaign ads on the television and radio does inform the people of the election and what is going on (assuming its true). If you one of those people who believe corporations are evil, then you are a hypocrites, but besides that, if you dont believe they have a right to speak on behalf of a canidate then we should take your right to free speech away from you. You can't try to limit someones opinion based on how much many they have or how the want to spend it or based on the fact the side Democrat or Republican.





For those who opposed the decision of United Citizens believe that allowing these companys to muck up and lie about other canidates will result in brainwashing. With frequent TV ads, radio ads and flyers many unknowing voters could be persuaded into voting for the canidate the companies are backing. In many ways this results in canidates' being able to buy the seat in the oval office. By allowing a third party to influence voters in an election, with the party often saying things their own way, its helps them swing the vote to the many americans undecided on either parties. Stephen Colbert's anti-superPAC campaigns help highlight the ludicrous accusations and lies told by superPACs'.

Thursday, March 8, 2012

Death or Dishonored

Should the death penalty be banned in the United States or is it an appropriate form of justice? Capital punishment has being going on since we as people have formed a system between right and wrong. Its worldwide, not just limited to the United States, and comes in many different forms. Does having the death penalty in a state really change someones' state of mind to kill someone or not? What would be the case if an innocent man was executed on death row? Killing a person for killing someone else will not bring that person back, but is seen as a form of closer for the victims family. Is an eye for an eye the proper way to approach this matter, ecspecially in todays' time with everyone becoming more open and understanding. As Ghandi once said "an eye for and eye leaves the whole world blind.

















I am truely on the fence on whether or not I see the death penalty as right or wrong. If someone does something wrong or illegal and are found guilty of the matter the should indeed be punished. To say its cruel to kill someone and hurt them who has hurt another person makes little since, because they should feel the pain that the person they killed felt. People are most afraid of death, so with a state having the death penalty in reality deters people from commiting capital crimes. People in our society gets what is coming to them, not always right away, but it will come back to haunt them. The cost factor could work for both sides, but it is clearly to pay to kill the person then provide for them in jail. Blacks and Hispanics are said to be over represented in capital punishment cases, they are claimed to be products of their enviorments, which maintains the idea that "poverty breeds crime".










Killing someone for killing someone is suppose to prevent someone from killing another, but what does that do for the people hurt the most? The victims family does not get their person back simply because the murder was killed. I personally would rather see the person rot in jail rather then get a free pass out of jail. Im sure most people sentenced to life in prison would rather die then years and years in prison. If the racial bias is true, then whites in the middle and upper class have a lot less to worry about then minorities of the lower class. During the case Furman V Georgia, the defense attorney stated that death row memebers were "'members of the human race as nonhumans, as objects to be toyed with and discarded", which is against the rights of citizens. The arguement could go both ways for me, each having it's own pros and cons. It is a form of justice that will be around, but I feel within the near future it will be seen as inhumane and abolished as a whole.